Irish Media: Stupidity or Duplicity?

Tesco-heiress Dame Shirley Porter -
Magaret Tatcher's favourite Criminal
Look at the linked headline below . . .

Tesco to create 220 jobs in Drogheda

Tesco will create 220 new jobs in Drogheda today with the opening of a new store in the town.

The supermarket chain said shoppers will also be able to chose products from six local suppliers whose foods will be highlighted on shelves by the Louth County colours.

Located in the Rathmullan Business Centre, just off the M1 motorway, the new store is Tesco Ireland’s 15th new premises opened this year.

It will be the second shop in Drogheda and fourth in Co Louth where 460 people are employed by the chain.

Local TD and Justice Minister Dermot Ahern said the new jobs were a major boost to the economy of the area.

“This is Tesco’s fourth store alone in Louth and they are to be commended for their commitment to their store opening programme and to job creation,” he added.

Tesco Ireland employs some 13,500 people.

while it is true that 220 jobs will be 'created' in a new Tesco store - it is NOT true that 220 jobs will in truth have been created.

Tesco offers a localised SERVICE. It does not manufacture anything. It certainly exports nothing except the massive profits it makes (off to Shirl, ex-Dame of the Realm, currently a fugitive from British Justice holed up in a comfy lair in Israel.)

Due to the nature of it's business and the business model itself, Tesco's new store will siphon jobs out of the local economy over a fairly short a period of time.

Ergo,in reality it is totally incorrect to say that any new jobs will be created by this new store, and indeed it is more than likely this store will have an negative impact on job figures in the area overall, as small locally-owned stores shut up shop, unable to compete with the purchasing power of the supermarket giant.

Media whores gotta earn a crust though . . .

No One Expects . . The Scott-Lee Inquisition!

Pic Stolen here
Does anyone need this spelled out for them? Oh, well I'll do it anyway . . .

S. M. E. A. R. . . . . J. O. B.

Michael Todd inquiry to focus on 'affairs'
Courtesy of Lord Patel (once again!)

The inquiry into the tangled love life of Chief Constable Michael Todd will focus on alleged affairs with five of his staff at Greater Manchester Police, it has emerged.
Michael Todd had a three-year affair with Angie Robinson
Investigators will trawl through hundreds of his text messages and emails, as well as examining the finances of the former police chief, who was found dead on a Welsh mountainside earlier this month in a suspected suicide.
The formal inquiry into his conduct has been launched to see whether Mr Todd's private life had any impact on his duties.
The Chief Constable had affairs with three civilian staff and two officers at Greater Manchester, it is claimed.
Two women with whom he allegedly had a relationship were said to have been promoted ahead of others who were said to be better qualified.

blah deblahdeblahblah . . . . smoke and mirrors . . . . more blah blah blah

The 50-year-old, who was nicknamed "Hot Toddy", is believed to have committed suicide in a mountain range at Snowdon.

eehhhhmmm, 'believed' by whom exactly?

Meanwhile, an inquest has opened and adjourned to a date yet to be fixed.

The North Wales coroner, Dewi Pritchard Jones, revealed that Mr Todd was twice the drink-drive limit in the hours before his death and his body showed signs of hypothermia.

Now that's a complete lie.

See what they did there?

There is absolutely NO evidence that Todd's blood/alcohol level was 'twice the drink-drive limit in the hours before his death'

There is, however, evidence that Todd was

"found to have 105 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood in his system, Caslin said. The legal limit for driving is 80 milligrams per 100 millilitres."
http://hubriticanomaly.blogspot.com/2008/03/third-policeman.html

Sooo, let's 'do the math(s)' . . . . 80 multipled by 2 = 160

. . . . NOT 105.

and as I said in an earlier post:

I mention the difference in reporting on the blood alcohol level because I find it hard to understand how someone with less than one and a half times the legal blood/alcohol limit for driving could be described as having a 'high blood-alcohol level' especially when one considers the fact that he was on foot and in Britain a blood/alcohol level of 105 mil per 100 could not possibly be considered above average given the high level of alcohol consumption prevalent amongst the population at large.

Nor was he driving at the time, so how the level of alcohol in his blood has any relevance to the legal blood/alcohol limit whilst driving a motor vehicle is beyond me.

That said, the level of blood/alcohol in his blood was, as I said less than one and a half times the legal driving limit.

As many are no doubt aware, the legal limit is purposely set at a very low level so as to ensure that any one driving a vehicle could not legally do so if their alcohol intake was sufficient to impair their driving ability.

Hence, to say that Mr Todd had a high blood-alcohol level, when the level was a mere 105 mil per 100, is quite misleading. Why The Guardian sub-editor that wrote the headline wished to mislead us is a question open to debate...

So the Telegraph's defence for this outright lie would be that they extrapolated backwards, using as a base the low level found in his blood, to arrive at the much larger figure of a higher level which they would claim must have earlier been in his system, since we are suppossed to believe that the dead policeman drank half a bottle of spirits before he died.

All complete poppycock of course.

I wonder if any of the 'journalists' or editors working at the Telegraph are members of any apron wearing rather secretive fraternities ubiqutious throughout the British establishment?

See also:
Rescue Services ask: 'Why didn't they call us earlier?'

• Mountain rescue chief says they could have saved top policeman on Snowdon
  
• Mystery of dark suited 'spooks' waiting at bottom of mountain
  
• Chinook helicopter appeared above body - but could not land
  
• 'Champagne was in police chief's rucksack'
  

The police chief who died on a blizzard-swept mountain might have survived if rescue services had been alerted earlier, according to the expert who masterminded the recovery of his body.
Peter Walker has provided the first detailed account of the hunt on Snowdon for Greater Manchester Police Chief Constable Michael Todd.
His claims raise a series of disturbing questions about the death of Mr Todd, who was tipped as a future Scotland Yard Commissioner.
Mr Walker, 52, a veteran of hundreds of rescue operations, alleges that mountain rescue services were not called in to search for the police chief, who had been linked with a number of women, until hours after he was first reported missing.

See what they did there, once again? They made sure we knew that the dead policeman

. . . had been linked with a number of women , . .(Shock, Horror!!!)

Just in case you didn't get it the other 100 times they made sure to mention it. We should at least be grateful they're not accusing him of kiddy fiddling. . . . yet


No One expects the Spanish Inquisition!!

Hola, Hola, Hola . . . 3 Top Cops, 3 Suicides(?) in 3 Days!

I was following the reddit comments discussing an (apparently non-Shakespearian :) earlier post I made here, and it occurred to me that to get some people to accept that conspiracies exist would take something akin to superhuman powers of persuasion.

The Reddit comment thread is named "3 Top Cops, 3 Suicides? and 3 Days" so I would have thought that contained all the info one might need to see the significance. It then occurred to me that even if these 3 dead Policemen were not 'Top Cops,' it would still be quite an interesting phenomenon, though one much more easily explained-away by the incurious as 'mere coincidence'. But if you note that, as one reddit-commenter did,

"you must admit that the most high profile one on the mountain is definitely strange. 2-3 weeks later and still no cause of death",

AND:

If you further note that there was a veritable media frenzy to try and deceive all-and-sundry into believing that not only was Shagger Todd very drunk he was also sending 'troubling texts' to many people which apparently put some of them in fear for their own safety.

Then consider that at the coroner's inquest it was found that: Shagger Todd had a mere 105 milligrams of alcohol per 100 milliliters which by any standard could not be considered a high level, and certainly did not merit the Guardian headline description of a 'high level'.

See: Police chief had high blood-alcohol level, inquest confirm

Consider also that much was made in the media of the fact that a half empty bottle of Spirits was found nearby. Todd was certainly not the one that drank the missing half, not with a mere 105 per 100 in his blood stream, unless it was a very small bottle of spirits. Since no one mentioned the size of the bottle it is intended that the reader assume that the bottle was normal sized i.e a 75 cl bottle. It is highly unlikely that Todd drank half of a 75cl bottle and was found with a mere 105 per 100 unless one arrived on the mountain top with a bottle that had been opened on a previous occasion, which, though possible, appears unlikely to me.

Consider also that apparently we are to believe that Todd went up this mountain in the middle of one of the worst storms to have hit the area in a number of years.

Consider also that much was also made in the media of the 'fact' that personal papers of Mr Todd were found 'scattered nearby'. Apparently these 'personal papers' were printed on a new-fangled superduper papertype that does not get blown away in the worst storm to hit the area in recent years. I'm off out tomorrow to buy shares in the company that makes it - I'm gonna be rich I tell ya!

Consider also the copious references to Shagger Todds shagging exploits as an apparent explaination as to why he might 'suicide' himself. For a male such as Shagger Todd I very much doubt that revealing such shenanigans would lead him to contemplate commiting suicide, but I may be wrong. It has been my experience that men who act as he did, for as long as he did, rarely have much of a bad conscience about it.

Consider also that Sgt. Fuller was reported to have been in good spirits in the time before his 'suicide', but admittedly that was sourced to 'friends' and who know, maybe the journalist in question just made it up.

Consider also that Inspector Munro was initially reported to have suffered a head wound. But later statements by the police specified no head wound.

Consider also that Inspector Munro had recently become the father of a child,

Consider also the unsourced reporting of Inspector Munro's apparent depressed state of mind

The court was told he was known to be suffering from chronic depression. No press reports give the author of this information, it's source, or if any evidence , or witness was provided to substantiate the claim. (UPDATE Thursday The Daily Echo Monday 17th said Headline "Inquest hears of inspector’s stress" - (Coroner's officer ) Mr Jeneson said: "The inspector was known to be suffering from chronic depression and was last seen at lunchtime. The PA report used the phrase "chronic depression".) Evidently someone supplied Mr Jeneson with that information.

Consider also the preponderance of Freemasons in powerful (and useful) positions throughout the British Establishment:

The inquiry into freemasonry was first suggested by a Labour member of the committee, Chris Mullin, who was disturbed at the number of freemasons who appeared to be involved in the Birmingham Six case.
Masons told to reveal themselves

Consider also that in a speech MP Chris Mullen gave to the House of Commons regarding the framing of the Birmingham Six he said that

of the 160 professional people connected with the case (by this he meant Police, Lawyers, Doctors and Journalists) over one hundred of them were found to be members of the Freemasons.
(That quote comes from Hansards originally, and may be slightly misquoted, but only slightly. You'll have to search pretty hard to find it there now, I couldn't)

Lastly, consider also that at present there have been numereous investigations into sexual abuse of children in British care homes, which were widely considered to be little more than coverups, and consider that in the case of Byyn Estyn, many of the abusers were reliably reported to be members of the Judiciary, local Politicians and Police Officers. British Freemasony gains much of it's notoriety from the fact that it draws many of it's members from the Police, the Judiciary, Politicians, Doctors and Journalists.

Admittedly my original post on the subject was badly wriiten so I hope that this one helps clarify things somewhat for the terminally incurious :)

A fine example of non-Mainstream Media Investigative Journalism

With all due respect: If you were looking for Mainstream media 'fair and balanced' investigative journalism, then you're probably at the wrong blog :)

A finer example of Hubris' style of 'Journalism'

Update: No One Expects . . The Scott-Lee Inquisition!

'allo, 'allo, 'allo . . . woz all this then?

Been watching ‘Der News’ . . .

A lot the footage of violent protest being ‘violently quelled’ by the Chinese in Tibet, is of protests taking place in Nepal and India, neither of which are controlled by the Chinese authorities. It appears Der Sheep-Herders™® don’t have the required footage of what they like to call ‘violent suppression of dissent’, to back up their claims. I’m not saying it’s not happening just that there doesn’t appear to be much evidence that it is happening to the extent Der Sheep-Herders™® would have us believe.



See: German news television regrets 'error' in covering Tibet riots

In fact, the picture shows security forces in Nepal, a neighboring country of China, RTL said in an online statement.

"The image was taken on March 17 in the capital city of Kathmandu, where Nepalese security forces were confronting demonstrators with batons," it said.

"We have accidentally created the impression that it is a scene of the unrest in Tibet with Chinese security forces involved. We regret this error," the statement added.

In a world where many phones now have cameras (even in Tibet they have mobile phones, definitely in the urban areas, which is where the rioting is taking place apparently) I’m astonished that Der Sheep-herders™®have not managed to obtain much footage of what they assure us is widespread.





But then these are the same people that deliberately lied to us about Saddam’s non-existent ‘Weapons of Mass Distraction’ so I don’t hold out much hope that what they are reporting reflects the reality of what is happening in Tibet. Constantly telling me about violence in Tibet while showing video of violence in Nepal and India (ie: violence in NOT-Tibet), makes me a little suspicious.



All in all this seems suspiciously similar to the various 'colour revolutions' the EU and the US are soooooo fond of, so long as they happen in countries whose governments are hostile to western Corporate interests. Were Europeans or US citizens to try the same tactics in their own countries I think the Western 'leaders' might take a very dim view of such 'democracy in action' at home.

A few days ago I blogged about these 'colour revolutions' and Globalisation, and their support from some decidedly murky proponents in an organisation known as The Albert Einstein Institute, See:Golden Straitjacket ? . . . more like Golden Steak-knife . . . . through the ribs

Absent from Friedman’s advertisement [of Globalisation] was any in-depth discussion of military action in order to cause ‘regime change’ in favour of ‘the herd’. Of Course military action is not the only weapon in the Pentagon/Globalists arsenal these days. Due to the work of one Gene Sharp, who is partly responsible for the so-called 'colour revolutions' we've heard so much of over the last few years, non-compliant governments can by removed by a combination of repetition of phrases such as 'The current Gov't are a bunch of election thieves' and organising student riots in favour of whatever political party offers the best deal for the predatory corporations.

A useful media-ownership resource from The Columbia Journalism Review:
http://www.cjr.org/resources/